Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Dominican Republic
24.6%
in 2021
Honduras
26.1%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
10th
Honduras rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 26.1% against 24.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Honduras ranks 8th of 30 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 22.5% | 3.3% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 24.8% | 2.4% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 26.1% against 24.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 1.5%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Honduras ranks 8th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group