Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 60.9% in 2020. ▬ Flat

Latest (2020)
60.9%
Change on year
up 161.4%
World rank
7th
of 27 countries
All-time high
60.9%
in 2020
All-time low
19.9%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia, 2007–2020

20304050602007201320202007: 50.42009: 37.32010: 40.72011: 30.42012: 31.82014: 19.92016: 33.32018: 23.32020: 60.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia stood at 60.9%. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 161.4% on the previous year and up 49.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia peaked at 60.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 19.9%, in 2014.

Mongolia ranks 7th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 50.4%
2009 37.3% -26.0%
2010 40.7% +9.2%
2011 30.4% -25.3%
2012 31.8% +4.5%
2014 19.9% -37.4%
2016 33.3% +67.1%
2018 23.3% -29.9%
2020 60.9% +161.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 43.8% 37.3% 50.4% 2
2010s 29.9% 19.9% 40.7% 6
2020s 60.9% 60.9% 60.9% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 4 Kyrgyzstan 83.8% compare
  2. 5 Republic of Moldova 71.5% compare
  3. 6 Georgia 61.4% compare
  4. 8 Pakistan 53.1% compare
  5. 9 Kosovo 52.2% compare
  6. 9 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 52.2% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Mongolia was 60.9% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 60.9% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 19.9% in 2014.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Mongolia ranks 7th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 49.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group