Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Kyrgyzstan
83.8%
in 2020
Mongolia
60.9%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Mongolia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 83.8% against 60.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 22.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.4 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Mongolia ranks 7th of 27 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.4% | 27.7% | 47.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 83.8% | 60.9% | 22.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 83.8% against 60.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 22.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Mongolia ranks 7th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group