Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova

Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 71.5% in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
71.5%
Change on year
up 15.0%
World rank
5th
of 27 countries
All-time high
72.9%
in 2010
All-time low
54.4%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova, 2010–2018

0204060802010201420182010: 72.92012: 69.62013: 54.42017: 62.22018: 71.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova is 71.5%, measured in 2018.

The figure is up 15.0% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova peaked at 72.9% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 54.4%, in 2013.

That places Republic of Moldova 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Republic of Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 72.9%
2012 69.6% -4.4%
2013 54.4% -21.8%
2017 62.2% +14.2%
2018 71.5% +15.0%

Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova

  1. 2 Armenia 92.4% compare
  2. 3 Viet Nam 91.9% compare
  3. 4 Kyrgyzstan 83.8% compare
  4. 6 Georgia 61.4% compare
  5. 7 Mongolia 60.9% compare
  6. 8 Pakistan 53.1% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Republic of Moldova

All data for Republic of Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Republic of Moldova was 71.5% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 72.9% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 54.4% in 2013.
How does Republic of Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Republic of Moldova ranks 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Republic of Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group