Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International Private in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International Private was 71.5% in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
71.5%
Change on year
up 15.0%
World rank
5th
of 27 countries
All-time high
72.9%
in 2010
All-time low
54.4%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova, 2010–2018

0204060802010201420182010: 72.92012: 69.62013: 54.42017: 62.22018: 71.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova is 71.5%, measured in 2018.

The figure is up 15.0% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova peaked at 72.9% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 54.4%, in 2013.

That places Moldova 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: International … 2nd International Private in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 72.9% —
2012 69.6% -4.4%
2013 54.4% -21.8%
2017 62.2% +14.2%
2018 71.5% +15.0%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 71.5% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 66.5%, 1.1× the median. (8 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 71.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 43.0%, 1.7× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Armenia 92.4% compare
  2. 3 Vietnam 91.9% compare
  3. 4 Kyrgyzstan 83.8% compare
  4. 6 Georgia 61.4% compare
  5. 7 Mongolia 60.9% compare
  6. 8 Pakistan 53.1% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Moldova was 71.5% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 72.9% in 2010.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 54.4% in 2013.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Moldova ranks 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group