Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 52.2% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
52.2%
World rank
9th
of 27 countries
All-time high
71.3%
in 2006
All-time low
44.5%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 71.32011: 552012: 44.52013: 48.12017: 52.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 52.2%, measured in 2017.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 26.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 71.3% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 44.5%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 9th out of 27 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 71.3%
2011 55.0% -22.8%
2012 44.5% -19.1%
2013 48.1% +8.0%
2017 52.2% +8.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 71.3% 71.3% 71.3% 1
2010s 49.9% 44.5% 55.0% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 6 Georgia 61.4% compare
  2. 7 Mongolia 60.9% compare
  3. 8 Pakistan 53.1% compare
  4. 9 Kosovo 52.2% compare
  5. 11 South Africa 49.3%
  6. 12 Sri Lanka 44.0% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 52.2% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 71.3% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 44.5% in 2012.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 9th out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 26.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group