Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 25.2% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 25.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.1% on the previous year and up 99.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 26.9% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 12.6%, in 2011.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 17.3% | — |
| 2011 | 12.6% | -27.0% |
| 2012 | 13.8% | +9.2% |
| 2013 | 17.9% | +30.1% |
| 2014 | 14.7% | -18.2% |
| 2015 | 17.4% | +18.6% |
| 2016 | 21.0% | +20.7% |
| 2017 | 26.9% | +27.9% |
| 2018 | 26.7% | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 24.2% | -9.5% |
| 2020 | 25.2% | +4.1% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 25.2% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 34.7%, 73% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.3% | 17.3% | 17.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 19.5% | 12.6% | 26.9% | 9 |
| 2020s | 25.2% | 25.2% | 25.2% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 7 Belarus 40.5% compare
- 8 Romania 28.9% compare
- 10 Argentina 24.7% compare
- 11 Kazakhstan 24.2% compare
- 12 Republic of Moldova 23.1% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kyrgyzstan was 25.2% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 26.9% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.6% in 2011.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th out of 26 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 99.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group