Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
24.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
25.2%
in 2020
Argentina rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 25.2% against 24.7% in Argentina, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.6% | 24.7% | 6.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 25.2% | 9.7% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 25.2% against 24.7% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group