Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
40.5%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
25.2%
in 2020
Belarus rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 40.5% against 25.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 15.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 40.5% against 25.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group