Adequacy of benefits … 1st poorest Unconditional Cash Transfers in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits … 1st poorest Unconditional Cash Transfers was 23.1% in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)
23.1%
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
12th
of 26 countries
All-time high
25.1%
in 2012
All-time low
22.3%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova, 2010–2018

01020302010201420182010: 23.42012: 25.12013: 22.32017: 22.72018: 23.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Moldova recorded 23.1% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in 2018.

That represents a change of up 1.6% on the previous year and down 1.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova peaked at 25.1% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 22.3%, in 2013.

Moldova ranks 12th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits … 1st poorest Unconditional Cash Transfers in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 23.4% —
2012 25.1% +7.4%
2013 22.3% -11.0%
2017 22.7% +1.7%
2018 23.1% +1.6%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 23.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.8%, 1.3× the median. (18 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 23.1% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 34.7%, 66% of the median. (12 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 9 Kyrgyzstan 25.2% compare
  2. 10 Argentina 24.7%
  3. 11 Kazakhstan 24.2% compare
  4. 13 Costa Rica 21.5% compare
  5. 14 Mongolia 18.0% compare
  6. 15 Ukraine 17.6% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova was 23.1% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 25.1% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 22.3% in 2013.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
Moldova ranks 12th out of 26 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group