Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 53.7% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia is 53.7%, measured in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.5% on the previous year and up 31.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia peaked at 58.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 39.2%, in 2012.
That places Georgia 3rd out of 26 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 41.0% | — |
| 2012 | 39.2% | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 45.6% | +16.4% |
| 2014 | 58.6% | +28.5% |
| 2015 | 54.3% | -7.2% |
| 2016 | 52.7% | -3.1% |
| 2017 | 56.2% | +6.7% |
| 2018 | 54.2% | -3.6% |
| 2019 | 53.3% | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 52.9% | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 53.7% | +1.5% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 53.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 39.8%, 1.3× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 53.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.2%, 2.3× the median. (18 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.6% | 39.2% | 58.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 53.3% | 52.9% | 53.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia was 53.7% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 58.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 39.2% in 2012.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 3rd out of 26 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group