Georgia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
53.7%
in 2021
Poland
55.7%
in 2019
Georgia rank
3rd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 55.7% against 53.7% in Georgia, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 26 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Poland?
- Poland, at 55.7% against 53.7% in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Poland?
- 2.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group