Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 55.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Poland stood at 55.7%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 111.1% on the previous year and up 98.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Poland peaked at 55.7% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 26.4%, in 2017.
That places Poland 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30.5% | — |
| 2006 | 30.7% | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 31.6% | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 28.5% | -9.9% |
| 2009 | 28.1% | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 31.6% | +12.5% |
| 2011 | 31.1% | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 31.2% | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 35.3% | +13.1% |
| 2016 | 31.8% | -10.2% |
| 2017 | 26.4% | -16.9% |
| 2019 | 55.7% | +111.1% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 55.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 39.8%, 1.4× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 55.7% is above the median for high income countries, which is 21.7%, 2.6× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.9% | 28.1% | 31.6% | 5 |
| 2010s | 34.7% | 26.4% | 55.7% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Poland was 55.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 55.7% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.4% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 98.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group