Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
53.7%
in 2021
Serbia
53.6%
in 2022
Georgia rank
3rd
Serbia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 53.7% against 53.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 4th of 26 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.9% | 38.2% | 13.6% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 45.0% | 8.7% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 53.7% against 53.6% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 4th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group