Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 67.4% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia is 67.4%, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 31.8% on the previous year and up 73.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia peaked at 98.7% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 28.2%, in 2007.
That places Serbia 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 28.2% | — |
| 2010 | 57.3% | +102.9% |
| 2013 | 38.9% | -32.0% |
| 2015 | 39.7% | +1.9% |
| 2018 | 59.1% | +48.8% |
| 2019 | 56.5% | -4.3% |
| 2021 | 98.7% | +74.6% |
| 2022 | 67.4% | -31.8% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 67.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 64.2%, 1.0× the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 67.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 35.7%, 1.9× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.2% | 28.2% | 28.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 50.3% | 38.9% | 59.1% | 5 |
| 2020s | 83.1% | 67.4% | 98.7% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 2 Armenia 104.6% compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 85.4% compare
- 4 Mongolia 84.7% compare
- 6 Republic of Moldova 61.1% compare
- 7 South Africa 60.0% compare
- 8 Georgia 58.7% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia was 67.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 98.7% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 28.2% in 2007.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Serbia ranks 5th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 73.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group