Armenia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
104.6%
in 2022
Serbia
67.4%
in 2022
Armenia rank
2nd
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 104.6% against 67.4% in Serbia, a difference of 37.2%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times Serbia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 101.4% | 50.3% | 51.1% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 111.1% | 83.1% | 28.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Serbia?
- Armenia, at 104.6% against 67.4% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Serbia?
- 37.2%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group