Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 85.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan stood at 85.4%.
That represents a change of down 2.6% on the previous year and down 10.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 145.2% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 62.2%, in 2012.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 84.9% | — |
| 2011 | 95.2% | +12.1% |
| 2012 | 62.2% | -34.6% |
| 2013 | 79.4% | +27.5% |
| 2014 | 136.1% | +71.5% |
| 2015 | 145.2% | +6.7% |
| 2016 | 126.2% | -13.1% |
| 2017 | 97.8% | -22.5% |
| 2018 | 82.9% | -15.2% |
| 2019 | 87.7% | +5.8% |
| 2020 | 85.4% | -2.6% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 85.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 64.2%, 1.3× the median. (8 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.9% | 84.9% | 84.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 101.4% | 62.2% | 145.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 85.4% | 85.4% | 85.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Kyrgyzstan was 85.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 145.2% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 62.2% in 2012.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group