Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Kyrgyzstan
85.4%
in 2020
Poland
44,786.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 44,786.4% against 85.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 44,701.0%.
That makes Poland's figure about 524.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 44,786.4% against 85.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 44,701.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group