Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
58.7%
in 2021
Serbia
67.4%
in 2022
Georgia rank
8th
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 67.4% against 58.7% in Georgia, a difference of 8.7%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.2% | 48.6% | 4.7% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 58.7% | 98.7% | 40.0% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 67.4% against 58.7% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and Serbia?
- 8.7%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group