Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan is 0.0001 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 1.8% on the previous year and up 4.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 2009.
That places Kazakhstan 179th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +142.0% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +114.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +95.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 176 Belarus 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 177 Iceland 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 178 Ukraine 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Jordan 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 181 Samoa 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 182 Mauritania 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Kazakhstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2152 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2212 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2086 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.02 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.25 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 15,866 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 7,093 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,815 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,857 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 33,672 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Kazakhstan was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2009.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Kazakhstan ranks 179th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.