Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus
Belarus: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus stood at 0.0001 units per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.
That represents a change of down 17.8% on the previous year and down 60.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus peaked at 0.0004 units per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 units per square kilometre, in 2023.
That places Belarus 176th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -17.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 173 Libya 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 174 Namibia 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 175 Turkmenistan 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 177 Iceland 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 178 Ukraine 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 179 Kazakhstan 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Belarus was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0004 units per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Belarus rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Belarus ranks 176th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.