Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience was 0.6191 in 2014. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2014)
0.6191
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
71st
of 90 countries
All-time high
1
in 1973
All-time low
0.1693
in 1986
Years of data
42
1973–2014

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe, 1973–2014

0.20.40.60.811973199320141973: 11974: 11975: 11976: 11977: 11978: 11979: 11980: 11981: 0.6721982: 0.6721983: 0.6721984: 0.6721985: 0.6721986: 0.1691987: 0.1691988: 0.1691989: 0.1691990: 0.1691991: 0.4361992: 0.4361993: 0.4361994: 0.4361995: 0.4361996: 0.4361997: 0.4361998: 0.4361999: 0.4362000: 0.4362001: 0.4362002: 0.4362003: 0.7032004: 0.7032005: 0.7032006: 0.6192007: 0.6192008: 0.6192009: 0.6192010: 0.6192011: 0.6192012: 0.6192013: 0.6192014: 0.619

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe is 0.6191, measured in 2014.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe peaked at 1 in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0.1693, in 1986.

That places Zimbabwe 71st out of 90 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 42 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 1 1 1 7
1980s 0.504 0.1693 1 10
1990s 0.4093 0.1693 0.436 10
2000s 0.5892 0.436 0.7027 10
2010s 0.6191 0.6191 0.6191 5

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 68 Cameroon 0.6342 compare
  2. 69 Mexico 0.628 compare
  3. 70 Russian Federation 0.624 compare
  4. 72 Mozambique 0.6151 compare
  5. 73 Sri Lanka 0.5852 compare
  6. 74 Germany 0.5734 compare

See the full ranking of 90 places β†’

More work & labour data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe?
Labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe was 0.6191 in 2014, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 1 in 1973.
What is the lowest labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1693 in 1986.
How does Zimbabwe rank for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
Zimbabwe ranks 71st out of 90 countries with data for 2014.
Is labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 11.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 42 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-market-s1-procedural-inconvenience/zimbabwe/">Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience in Zimbabwe</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 3,515 data points, 1973–2014
Last refreshed

The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.