Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Mozambique
0.6151
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.6191
in 2014
Mozambique rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
71st
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience over time
- Mozambique
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.6191 against 0.6151 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mozambique ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9667 | 1 | 0.0333 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.8611 | 0.504 | 0.3571 | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 0.6984 | 0.4093 | 0.289 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 0.6507 | 0.5892 | 0.0614 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.6151 | 0.6191 | 0.004 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience, Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.6191 against 0.6151 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 0.004, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
- How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
- Mozambique ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.