Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland
Poland: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private was 42.8% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland stood at 42.8%.
That represents a change of up 36.0% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland peaked at 47.4% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 31.5%, in 2017.
That places Poland 9th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 41.8% | — |
| 2006 | 41.7% | -0.2% |
| 2007 | 45.0% | +7.9% |
| 2008 | 41.4% | -8.0% |
| 2009 | 42.5% | +2.6% |
| 2010 | 47.4% | +11.6% |
| 2011 | 43.0% | -9.3% |
| 2012 | 42.0% | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 39.7% | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 34.8% | -12.2% |
| 2017 | 31.5% | -9.6% |
| 2019 | 42.8% | +36.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 42.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 42.8%, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Poland's 42.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 33.4%, 1.3× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5% | 41.4% | 45.0% | 5 |
| 2010s | 40.2% | 31.5% | 47.4% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland?
- Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private in Poland was 42.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 47.4% in 2010.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 31.5% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Poland ranks 9th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population