Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private
Kyrgyzstan
43.8%
in 2020
Poland
42.8%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Poland rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 43.8% against 42.8% in Poland, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.8% | 41.7% | 0.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 38.0% | 39.0% | 1.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 43.8% against 42.8% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population