Paraguay vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private
Paraguay
38.3%
in 2022
Poland
42.8%
in 2019
Paraguay rank
10th
Poland rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Paraguay
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 42.8% against 38.3% in Paraguay, a difference of 4.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Paraguay ranks 10th and Poland ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.2% | 43.0% | 1.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 34.9% | 40.2% | 5.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private, Paraguay or Poland?
- Poland, at 42.8% against 38.3% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private between Paraguay and Poland?
- 4.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Poland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Paraguay ranks 10th and Poland ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population