Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland
Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic was 13.5% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland stood at 13.5%.
That represents a change of up 6.6% on the previous year and down 28.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland peaked at 20.7% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 12.7%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 28th of 30 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20.7% | — |
| 2006 | 19.9% | -3.9% |
| 2007 | 19.2% | -3.3% |
| 2008 | 18.8% | -2.4% |
| 2009 | 18.8% | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 20.3% | +7.8% |
| 2011 | 18.8% | -7.1% |
| 2012 | 18.9% | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 16.0% | -14.9% |
| 2016 | 15.2% | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 12.7% | -16.6% |
| 2019 | 13.5% | +6.6% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 13.5% is below the median for high income countries, which is 27.6%, 49% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 13.5% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 21.4%, 63% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.5% | 18.8% | 20.7% | 5 |
| 2010s | 16.5% | 12.7% | 20.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland?
- Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic in Poland was 13.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 20.7% in 2005.
- What is the lowest beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.7% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Poland ranks 28th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population