Honduras vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Honduras
12.0%
in 2019
Poland
13.5%
in 2019
Honduras rank
29th
Poland rank
28th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Honduras
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13.5% against 12.0% in Honduras, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Honduras ranks 29th and Poland ranks 28th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 18.8% | 2.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 16.2% | 16.1% | 0.1% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Honduras or Poland?
- Poland, at 13.5% against 12.0% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Honduras and Poland?
- 1.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Honduras ranks 29th and Poland ranks 28th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population