Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Peru
14.0%
in 2022
Poland
13.5%
in 2019
Peru rank
25th
Poland rank
28th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.0% against 13.5% in Poland, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Peru ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.9% | 18.8% | 4.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 13.6% | 16.5% | 2.9% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Peru or Poland?
- Peru, at 14.0% against 13.5% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Peru and Poland?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Peru ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population