Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 9.4% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Latest (2022)
9.4%
Change on year
up 33.7%
World rank
7th
of 25 countries
All-time high
16.0%
in 2015
All-time low
5.5%
in 2019
Years of data
8
2007–2022
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 9.4% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.7% on the previous year and down 27.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia peaked at 16.0% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 5.5%, in 2019.
Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 11.4% | — |
| 2010 | 9.8% | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 12.9% | +32.4% |
| 2015 | 16.0% | +23.7% |
| 2018 | 6.7% | -58.2% |
| 2019 | 5.5% | -17.8% |
| 2021 | 7.1% | +28.7% |
| 2022 | 9.4% | +33.7% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 9.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 8.3%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 9.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.7%, 1.7× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.4% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 1 |
| 2010s | 10.2% | 5.5% | 16.0% | 5 |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 7.1% | 9.4% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 4 Kosovo 12.4% compare
- 4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 12.4% compare
- 6 Belarus 11.0% compare
- 8 Kyrgyzstan 8.7% compare
- 9 Poland 7.9% compare
- 10 Kazakhstan 7.8% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Serbia was 9.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 16.0% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.5% in 2019.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Serbia ranks 7th out of 25 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group