Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 12.4% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
12.4%
World rank
4th
of 25 countries
All-time high
14.2%
in 2006
All-time low
7.0%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, 2006–2017

0510152006201120172006: 14.22011: 8.22012: 72013: 13.72017: 12.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo is 12.4%, measured in 2017.

The figure is down 12.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo peaked at 14.2% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 7.0%, in 2012.

Kosovo ranks 4th of 25 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 14.2%
2011 8.2% -42.4%
2012 7.0% -14.3%
2013 13.7% +95.2%
2017 12.4% -9.4%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 12.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 8.3%, 1.5× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 12.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.7%, 2.2× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.2% 14.2% 14.2% 1
2010s 10.3% 7.0% 13.7% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 1 Pakistan 29.9% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 21.8% compare
  3. 3 Republic of Moldova 12.6% compare
  4. 4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 12.4% compare
  5. 6 Belarus 11.0% compare
  6. 7 Serbia 9.4% compare

See the full ranking of 25 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo was 12.4% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 14.2% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 7.0% in 2012.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Kosovo ranks 4th out of 25 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-urban/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 210 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group