Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 7.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland stood at 7.9%.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.3% on the previous year and up 9.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland peaked at 12.1% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 4.2%, in 2008.
Poland ranks 9th of 25 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 7.2% | — |
| 2006 | 8.9% | +24.2% |
| 2007 | 5.7% | -35.9% |
| 2008 | 4.2% | -26.6% |
| 2009 | 7.2% | +72.2% |
| 2010 | 8.1% | +12.3% |
| 2011 | 7.9% | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 10.5% | +33.0% |
| 2015 | 12.1% | +14.7% |
| 2016 | 9.6% | -20.4% |
| 2017 | 9.4% | -2.0% |
| 2019 | 7.9% | -16.3% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 7.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 8.3%, 95% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 7.9% is above the median for high income countries, which is 4.7%, 1.7× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.7% | 4.2% | 8.9% | 5 |
| 2010s | 9.4% | 7.9% | 12.1% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland was 7.9% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 12.1% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.2% in 2008.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Poland ranks 9th out of 25 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group