Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kyrgyzstan
8.7%
in 2020
Poland
7.9%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Poland rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 8.7% against 7.9% in Poland, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 25 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.4% | 8.9% | 1.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 8.7% | 9.6% | 0.9% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 8.7% against 7.9% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group