Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 11.5% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 11.5% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 83.6% on the previous year and up 109.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland peaked at 11.5% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 5.5%, in 2009.
Poland ranks 6th of 24 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 5.5% | — |
| 2006 | 5.7% | +2.9% |
| 2007 | 6.9% | +21.6% |
| 2008 | 5.9% | -15.2% |
| 2009 | 5.5% | -6.8% |
| 2010 | 5.5% | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 7.3% | +32.6% |
| 2012 | 6.1% | -16.3% |
| 2015 | 8.0% | +31.4% |
| 2016 | 6.9% | -13.9% |
| 2017 | 6.3% | -9.3% |
| 2019 | 11.5% | +83.6% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 11.5% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 9.8%, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 11.5% is above the median for high income countries, which is 5.9%, 1.9× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.9% | 5.5% | 6.9% | 5 |
| 2010s | 7.4% | 5.5% | 11.5% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Poland was 11.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 11.5% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.5% in 2009.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Poland ranks 6th out of 24 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 109.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group