Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kyrgyzstan
10.4%
in 2020
Poland
11.5%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Poland rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 11.5% against 10.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 5.7% | 2.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 7.7% | 3.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 11.5% against 10.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 1.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group