Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 13.1% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
13.1%
World rank
3rd
of 24 countries
All-time high
21.6%
in 2006
All-time low
11.2%
in 2011
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

051015202006201120172006: 21.62011: 11.22012: 13.82013: 14.22017: 13.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 13.1%, measured in 2017.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 39.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 21.6% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 11.2%, in 2011.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd of 24 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 21.6%
2011 11.2% -48.0%
2012 13.8% +22.9%
2013 14.2% +2.9%
2017 13.1% -7.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 1
2010s 13.1% 11.2% 14.2% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 1 Armenia 17.9% compare
  2. 2 Moldova 13.6% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo 13.1% compare
  4. 5 Belarus 12.7% compare
  5. 6 Poland 11.5% compare

See the full ranking of 24 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 13.1% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 21.6% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 11.2% in 2011.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd out of 24 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 39.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
24 places, 202 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group