Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional was 13.6% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
13.6%
Change on year
up 66.0%
World rank
2nd
of 24 countries
All-time high
13.6%
in 2018
All-time low
4.3%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova, 2010–2018

4681012142010201420182010: 4.32012: 4.72013: 5.32017: 8.22018: 13.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova is 13.6%, measured in 2018. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 66.0% on the previous year and up 213.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova peaked at 13.6% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 4.3%, in 2010.

That places Moldova 2nd out of 24 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 4.3%
2012 4.7% +9.0%
2013 5.3% +11.9%
2017 8.2% +54.9%
2018 13.6% +66.0%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 13.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 9.8%, 1.4× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 13.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 6.3%, 2.1× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 1 Armenia 17.9% compare
  2. 3 Kosovo 13.1% compare
  3. 3 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 13.1% compare
  4. 5 Belarus 12.7% compare

See the full ranking of 24 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional in Moldova was 13.6% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 13.6% in 2018.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 4.3% in 2010.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
Moldova ranks 2nd out of 24 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 213.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
24 places, 202 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group