Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 37.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan stood at 37.4%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 18.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 38.1% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 30.1%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 30.1% | — |
| 2011 | 31.6% | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 36.2% | +14.6% |
| 2013 | 35.8% | -1.1% |
| 2014 | 36.3% | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 38.1% | +4.7% |
| 2016 | 36.3% | -4.7% |
| 2017 | 37.1% | +2.4% |
| 2018 | 37.5% | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 37.3% | -0.7% |
| 2020 | 37.4% | +0.5% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 37.4% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 22.2%, 1.7× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 37.4% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 43.9%, 85% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.1% | 30.1% | 30.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 36.2% | 31.6% | 38.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 37.4% | 37.4% | 37.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Kyrgyzstan was 37.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 38.1% in 2015.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.1% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group