Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and was 34.5% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
In 2021, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia stood at 34.5%. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 31.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia peaked at 34.5% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 25.9%, in 2012.
That places Georgia 15th out of 37 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and in Georgia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 26.2% | — |
| 2012 | 25.9% | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 28.0% | +7.7% |
| 2014 | 30.4% | +8.6% |
| 2015 | 29.8% | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 32.3% | +8.6% |
| 2017 | 29.7% | -8.1% |
| 2018 | 29.3% | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 29.9% | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 34.5% | +15.5% |
| 2021 | 34.5% | +0.1% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 34.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 30.9%, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 34.5% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 43.9%, 79% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.0% | 25.9% | 32.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 34.5% | 34.5% | 34.5% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and in Georgia was 34.5% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 34.5% in 2021.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.9% in 2012.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Georgia ranks 15th out of 37 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group