Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Kyrgyzstan
37.4%
in 2020
Uruguay
39.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Uruguay rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 39.8% against 37.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 37 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.3% | 39.9% | 3.6% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 37.4% | 40.9% | 3.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 39.8% against 37.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 2.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group