Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 77.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland is 77.8%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 39.2% on the previous year and up 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland peaked at 77.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55.9%, in 2017.
Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 72.8% | — |
| 2006 | 67.2% | -7.8% |
| 2007 | 66.7% | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 65.6% | -1.7% |
| 2009 | 65.3% | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 66.1% | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 66.3% | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 65.2% | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 67.4% | +3.3% |
| 2016 | 68.1% | +1.0% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | -17.9% |
| 2019 | 77.8% | +39.2% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 77.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 53.8%, 1.4× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Poland's 77.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 55.6%, 1.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5% | 65.3% | 72.8% | 5 |
| 2010s | 66.7% | 55.9% | 77.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Poland was 77.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 77.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 55.9% in 2017.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Poland ranks 4th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group