Poland vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Poland
77.8%
in 2019
Uruguay
63.9%
in 2022
Poland rank
4th
Uruguay rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Poland
- Uruguay
How they compare
Poland currently reports 77.8% against 63.9% in Uruguay, a difference of 13.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.4% | 44.2% | 21.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 66.7% | 66.1% | 0.5% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Poland or Uruguay?
- Poland, at 77.8% against 63.9% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Poland and Uruguay?
- 13.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Poland ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group