Poland vs Romania: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Poland
77.8%
in 2019
Romania
92.9%
in 2021
Poland rank
4th
Romania rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Poland
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 92.9% against 77.8% in Poland, a difference of 15.1%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 4th and Romania ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.6% | 62.6% | 2.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 69.3% | 73.6% | 4.3% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Poland or Romania?
- Romania, at 92.9% against 77.8% in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Poland and Romania?
- 15.1%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Romania rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Poland ranks 4th and Romania ranks 2nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group