Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 19.1% in 2017. ▬ Flat

Latest (2017)
19.1%
World rank
6th
of 26 countries
All-time high
19.3%
in 2012
All-time low
16.9%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kosovo, 2006–2017

051015202006201120172006: 18.7 preT2011: 17.1 preT2012: 19.3 preT2013: 16.9 preT2017: 19.1 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kosovo is 19.1%, measured in 2017.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kosovo peaked at 19.3% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 16.9%, in 2013.

That places Kosovo 6th out of 26 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year preT Change
2006 18.7%
2011 17.1% -8.8%
2012 19.3% +13.0%
2013 16.9% -12.6%
2017 19.1% +12.9%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 19.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.6%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 19.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 11.3%, 1.7× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 18.7% 18.7% 18.7% 1
2010s 18.1% 16.9% 19.3% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 3 Belarus 24.6% compare
  2. 4 Armenia 20.7% compare
  3. 5 Romania 20.6% compare
  4. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.1% compare
  5. 8 Kazakhstan 16.1% compare
  6. 9 Kyrgyzstan 15.8% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kosovo was 19.1% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 19.3% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 16.9% in 2013.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Kosovo ranks 6th out of 26 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group