Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 15.8% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan is 15.8%, measured in 2020.
That represents a change of down 7.5% on the previous year and up 60.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 18.0% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 7.7%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 7.7% | — |
| 2011 | 9.9% | +27.7% |
| 2012 | 10.0% | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 12.0% | +20.0% |
| 2014 | 11.7% | -2.2% |
| 2015 | 12.4% | +5.8% |
| 2016 | 14.7% | +18.2% |
| 2017 | 18.0% | +22.7% |
| 2018 | 17.5% | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 17.1% | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 15.8% | -7.5% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 15.8% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.6%, 90% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.7% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 1 |
| 2010s | 13.7% | 9.9% | 18.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 15.8% | 15.8% | 15.8% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 6 Kosovo 19.1% compare
- 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.1% compare
- 8 Kazakhstan 16.1% compare
- 10 Republic of Moldova 15.7% compare
- 11 Serbia 15.3% compare
- 12 Viet Nam 11.6% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Kyrgyzstan was 15.8% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 18.0% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.7% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th out of 26 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 60.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group