Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash was 24.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
24.6%
Change on year
down 6.7%
World rank
3rd
of 26 countries
All-time high
42.1%
in 2016
All-time low
12.1%
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, 2008–2019

102030402008201320192008: 12.5 preT2009: 12.1 preT2010: 13.3 preT2012: 15.7 preT2013: 21.9 preT2014: 23.5 preT2015: 23.9 preT2016: 42.1 preT2017: 25.5 preT2018: 26.4 preT2019: 24.6 preT

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 24.6% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in 2019.

That represents a change of down 6.7% on the previous year and up 103.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus peaked at 42.1% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 12.1%, in 2009.

That places Belarus 3rd out of 26 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT) in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year preT Change
2008 12.5%
2009 12.1% -3.0%
2010 13.3% +9.6%
2012 15.7% +18.2%
2013 21.9% +39.8%
2014 23.5% +7.0%
2015 23.9% +1.7%
2016 42.1% +76.5%
2017 25.5% -39.5%
2018 26.4% +3.4%
2019 24.6% -6.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.3% 12.1% 12.5% 2
2010s 24.1% 13.3% 42.1% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 31.0% compare
  2. 2 Georgia 26.5% compare
  3. 4 Armenia 20.7% compare
  4. 5 Romania 20.6% compare
  5. 6 Kosovo 19.1% compare
  6. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.1% compare

See the full ranking of 26 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash in Belarus was 24.6% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 42.1% in 2016.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 12.1% in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Belarus ranks 3rd out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 103.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-pret/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT)
Unit
preT
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group