Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 82.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 82.3% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.5% on the previous year and up 22.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Belarus peaked at 82.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55.6%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 55.6% | — |
| 2009 | 67.2% | +20.7% |
| 2010 | 60.5% | -10.0% |
| 2012 | 65.7% | +8.7% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | +17.0% |
| 2014 | 76.7% | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 74.9% | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 75.6% | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 81.1% | +7.3% |
| 2018 | 77.3% | -4.7% |
| 2019 | 82.3% | +6.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 82.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 49.0%, 1.7× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 82.3% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 62.3%, 1.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.4% | 55.6% | 67.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 74.5% | 60.5% | 82.3% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Belarus was 82.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 82.3% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 55.6% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group