Belarus vs Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Belarus
82.3%
in 2019
Moldova
63.6%
in 2018
Belarus rank
4th
Moldova rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Belarus
- Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 82.3% against 63.6% in Moldova, a difference of 18.7%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Moldova's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 4th and Moldova ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Belarus or Moldova?
- Belarus, at 82.3% against 63.6% in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Belarus and Moldova?
- 18.7%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Moldova ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group