Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Belarus
82.3%
in 2019
Poland
115.9%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 115.9% against 82.3% in Belarus, a difference of 33.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.4% | 87.3% | 25.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 73.3% | 97.8% | 24.5% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 115.9% against 82.3% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Belarus and Poland?
- 33.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group