Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Mongolia
Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 17.6% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Latest (2020)
17.6%
Change on year
up 36.6%
World rank
14th
of 25 countries
All-time high
24.0%
in 2011
All-time low
8.8%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2020
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Mongolia, 2007–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Mongolia stood at 17.6%.
The figure is up 36.6% on the previous year and up 48.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Mongolia peaked at 24.0% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 8.8%, in 2014.
Mongolia ranks 14th of 25 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 12.2% | — |
| 2009 | 18.3% | +49.9% |
| 2010 | 11.8% | -35.2% |
| 2011 | 24.0% | +102.9% |
| 2012 | 21.9% | -8.7% |
| 2014 | 8.8% | -60.0% |
| 2016 | 10.9% | +23.9% |
| 2018 | 12.9% | +18.8% |
| 2020 | 17.6% | +36.6% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 17.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.6%, 1.0× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 12.2% | 18.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 15.1% | 8.8% | 24.0% | 6 |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 17.6% | 17.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 11 Kyrgyzstan 21.7% compare
- 12 Republic of Moldova 19.6% compare
- 13 Costa Rica 18.5% compare
- 15 Ukraine 15.3% compare
- 16 Viet Nam 11.9% compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 8.8% compare
More work & labour data for Mongolia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1039 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1076 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0999 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.07 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.05 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,167 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 908.11 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,756 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,763 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,519 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Mongolia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Mongolia was 17.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 24.0% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.8% in 2014.
- How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mongolia ranks 14th out of 25 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 48.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group