Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mongolia
17.6%
in 2020
Viet Nam
11.9%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
14th
Viet Nam rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 17.6% against 11.9% in Viet Nam, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 25 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.9% | 5.4% | 8.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 11.9% | 5.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 17.6% against 11.9% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mongolia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group